CRAMERBEHAVIOR LAB Built by Cramer ↗
♠ Follow-through

The Planning Fallacy

Everyone thinks it'll take less time than it does. Including you.

The research, plainly

Kahneman and Tversky named it; Buehler's studies measured it: people predict finishing far sooner than they do, even with full knowledge of their own past overruns. The inside view of the plan blinds us to the base rate of reality.

The receipt: Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Buehler et al., 1994

What it means for events

Every run-of-show is optimistic fiction. Sessions run long, transitions eat minutes, the demo needs a restart — and the buffer you added isn't enough, because it never is. Cut content in the plan, calmly, rather than on the day, brutally.

Where to run it

Agenda math

Whatever the segment needs, schedule less content than fits. The cut you make in planning is the peak you save in delivery.

Rehearsal policy

The full technical rehearsal exists because the inside view lies. Time everything against a stopwatch, not a hope.

Project timelines

Take your event build estimate and apply your own history to it — the base rate is the truth your plan is avoiding.

Seen in the wild

The Sydney Opera House — planned for 1963 at $7 million, delivered in 1973 at $102 million — is the fallacy's cathedral, and every event professional's load-in war story is the same study replicated with forklifts.

Related concepts

All 115 concepts in the Library →

Now use it

Score your own event against principles like this one — or make the whole vocabulary official.

Score your event Get certified